2 edition of Draft supplemental environmental impact statement pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), P.L. 91-190 found in the catalog.
Draft supplemental environmental impact statement pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), P.L. 91-190
United States. Federal Highway Administration. Region Ten.
1979 by U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Federal Highway Projects in Vancouver, Wash .
Written in English
|Other titles||Draft supplemental environmental impact statement - 1979 :|
|Statement||prepared by Office of Federal Highway Projects, Region Ten.|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||xviii, 108 p. :|
|Number of Pages||108|
of the National Environmental Policy Act of (42 U.S.C. ). (2) Any person who may wish to apply for an exemption under subsection (g) of the section for that action may conduct a biological assessment to identify any endangered species or threatened species which is likely to be affected by such action. CACOPP brought the suit pursuant to, among other things, the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. §§ , claiming that it has been and continues to be irreparably harmed by the acts and omissions of the BOP, having been adversely affected and aggrieved by such acts and omission within the meaning of APA, 5 U.S.C. §  In an early step under NEPA, an agency must decide whether to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS). See 40 C.F.R. § (). EISs are required under NEPA for major federal actions significantly affecting the environment. See National Environmental Protection Act of , 42 U.S.C. § (2)(C) (). In order to make this determination, the agency first . 81 FR - Supplemental Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Transcameron 81 FR - Intent To Prepare a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Springfield which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of (42 U.S.C. f.
See 36 CFR § (f) (). Because that decision is a "major Federal action" within the meaning of NEPA, it must be preceded by the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). 42 U.S.C. § If the Service decides to issue a permit, it then proceeds to select a developer, formulate the basic terms of the arrangement with.
A faraway island
Creation and analysis of freshwater sediment quality values in Washington State
How to study physics.
Konica SR 501 rapid automatic X-ray film processor and automatic chemical mixer unit.
Celebrated speeches of Chatham, Burke, and Erskine
The lamp and the lute
Applications of category theory to programming and program specification
Learning to teach
Mastering English composition
In vitro digestibility of leaves and stems of Dactylis glomerata L. at different stages of growth.
Performance of some tests for bivariate independence, interchangeability, and equality of distributions of ratios
small household of the XVth century
Hearing on H.R. 595 ... before the Seapower and Strategic and Critical Materials Subcommittee of the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, Ninety-sixth Congress, first session, March 2, 1979
Regulations no. 6 relating to the seizure, forfeiture, and disposition of vessels, vehicles, and aircraft used to transport narcotic drugs, etc. under the Act of August 9, 1939.
Man in the world
The term "environmental impact statement" means the detailed written statement required under section (2)(C) of NEPA [42 U.S.C. (2)(C)]. (11) Environmental review The term "environmental review" means the agency procedures and processes for applying a categorical exclusion or for preparing an environmental assessment, an environmental.
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement For Commercial Reentry Vehicles Submitted Pursuant to 42 USC (2) (c) by the U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Commercial Space Transportation Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of42 U.S.C.
(2)(C), the National Park Service announces Draft supplemental environmental impact statement pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4332 book availability of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Resource Protection Study for Curecanti National Recreation Area, Colorado. Start Preamble SUMMARY: Pursuant to § (2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of (Pub.
42 U.S.C.January 1,as amended), and the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations (40 CFR Part ), the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, has prepared a Draft Draft supplemental environmental impact statement pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4332 book Impact Statement identifying.
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Production of Tritiu m in a Commercial Light Water Reactor (DOE/EISS1) (SEIS) CONTACTS: For further information on this SEIS, please contact: Curtis Chambellan CLWR SEIS Document Manager P.O.
Box Albuquerque, NM () () (facsimile). DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Volume 1 prepared by U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration and Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County Houston, Texas Pursuant to National Environmental Policy Act of Draft supplemental environmental impact statement pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
4332 book, (42 U.S.C. § ). Book/Printed Material US high Browning to Hudson Bay Divide: STPP (19)0-control number (Browning to Kiowa) reference post 0 to reference post 12 and STPP (19)0-control number (Kiowa to Hudson Bay Divide) reference post 12 to reference post in Glacier County, Montana: draft environmental impact statement and section 4(f) evaluation /.
"Prepared pursuant to: National Environmental Policy Act of # (42 U.S.C. #); Federal Transit Law (49 U.S.C. #(e), #(b) and #(b); 49 U.S.C. # (formerly Department of Transportation Act of#4(f)); National Historic Preservation Act of# (16 U.S.C. #f); Executive Order (Protection of Wetlands.
In addition to the question whether an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of (NEPA), 83 Stat.42 U.S.C. § et seq., must contain a complete mitigation plan and a "worst case analysis," which we answered in Robertson, it presents the question Draft supplemental environmental impact statement pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
4332 book information. Administrative Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement and Section 4(f) Evaluation for the Westside Purple Line Extension prepared by the U.S. Department ofTransportation Federal Transit Administration and the Los Angeles county Metropolitan Transportation Authority Submitted pursuant to.
would be "inimical to the health and safety of the public." 42 U.S.C. § (d). The Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (DSEIS) cites numerous reports on evidentiary reviews, assessments, and the results of those actions. It is. Draft environmental assessment/environmental impact report/environmental impact statement (EA/EIR/EIS).
Two of the build alternatives propose to change the existing four lane roadway to a three lane roadway, while one build alternative maintains a four lane configuration. Environmental Impact Statement Determinations Adoption of other agencies' EISs.
Use of prior environmental impact statements Subpart G--Environmental Review Process: Procedures for Draft, Final and Supplemental Environmental Impact Statements Notice of intent to prepare an EIS.
Scoping process. The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), in cooperation with the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and in coordination with the Maryland Department of Transportation and the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak), completed the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) and Section 4(f) Evaluation for the B&P Tunnel Project.
This Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Draft EIS) analyzes the environmental impacts of fuel economy standards and reasonable alternative standards for model years passenger cars and light trucks (“light-duty vehicles”) that NHTSA has proposed under the.
Full text of "Gateway West Transmission Line Project [draft supplemental] environmental impact statement" See other formats. Road improvements proposed for SR (24th Avenue West to SR ): environmental assessment pursuant to 42 U.S.C. (2) (c) and 23 C.F.R. part (Book). The statutory mandate that agencies detail “any adverse environmental effects which cannot be avoided should the proposal be implemented,” 42 U.S.C.
§ (C)(ii), implicitly assumes “that. Urban Mass Transportation Administration: Southwest Freeway/transitway project: draft environmental impact statement, FHWA-TX-EISD, submitted pursuant to the National Environment Policy Act, 42 U.S.C.
(2) (c) / (Washington, D.C.: Urban Mass Transportation Administration ; Fort Worth, Tex.: distributed by Urban Mass Transportation. Full text of "Draft environmental impact statement supplement for the Federal Coal Management Program" See other formats. Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Production of Tritium in a Commercial Light Water Reactor (DOE/EISS1) (SEIS) CONTACTS: For further information on this SEIS, please contact: Curtis Chambellan CLWR SEIS Document Manager P.O.
Box Albuquerque, NM () () (facsimile). Section 6—Final Environmental Impact Statement CHAPTER 5 – ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES Section – Bald Eagles, Federal and State Threatened and Endangered Species Bald Eagles, Federal and State Threatened and Endangered Species Since the publication of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (), the following DEIS.
DRAFT ENVIRONMNTAL IMACT STATEMENT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION Submitted pursuant to 42 U.S.C. (2) (C) and 23 U;S.C. (a) W2 4 f I DATE Donald Hammer, File Size: 9MB. By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to establish, in accordance with the goals and purposes of the National Environmental Policy Act ofas amended (42 U.S.C.
et seq.), the Environmental Quality Improvement Act ofas amended (42 U.S.C. Under NEPA, all Forest Service proposals for major federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment must include detailed statements of the environmental effects and alternatives to proposals (42 U.S.C.
(C)). Environmental effects include ecological effects ``such as the effects on natural resources and on the. Section 6—Final Environmental Impact Statement CHAPTER 5 – ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES Section – Aboveground Historic Resource Impacts Aboveground Historic Resource Impacts Since the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), the following substantive changes have been made to this section.
42 u.s.c. § (2)(c). Agencies must also “study, develop, and describe appropriate alternatives to recommended courses of action in any proposal which involves unresolved conflicts concerning.
Finally, the federal approval process also will require an environmental impact statement that considers alternatives to the “proposed action,” which includes construction of the alternative conveyance (National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. § (2)(C)(iii)). A Review of the Use of Science and Adaptive Management in California.
NEPA requires all agencies of the federal government to include, in every recommendation or report on proposals for major federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, a detailed statement by the responsible official on the environmental impact of the proposed action.
42 U.S.C. § (2) (C) (i). The National Environmental Policy Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Sec. (2)(c), requires that whenever a federal agency undertakes "major federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment," it must first prepare a "detailed statement" of the action's anticipated environmental impacts.
Mountaintop Mining/Valley Fill Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Programmatic Review Ideas for Government Action December Introduction This document presents — for public review and discussion — a number of ideas for potential government action to address the environmental impacts of mountaintop mining and valley fills in the Appalachian coalfields.
PART 2—AGENCY RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE. Note: Electronic filing and service of documents in proceedings for which notices of opportunity for hearing were published in the Federal Register or on the NRC website before Octoare governed by the Part 2 rules in effect prior to the NRC E-Filing Rule (72 Fed.
Reg. (Aug. 28, )). Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-appellants, v. the City of New York, et al., Defendants-appellees, F.2d (2d Cir.
) case opinion from the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. 42 U.S.C. § (C).*fn9 The EIS "`insures the integrity of the agency process by forcing it to face those stubborn, difficult-to-answer objections without ignoring them or sweeping them under the rug' and serves as an `environmental full disclosure law so that the public can weigh a project's benefits against its environmental costs.'".
National Environmental Policy Act, Section (2)(c), 42 U.S.C. (2)(c); Title 49 U.S.C. Sectionformerly Department of Transportation Act ofthe Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), Section 4(f) 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part NEPA requires a federal agency to prepare an environmental impact statement, or EIS, only when the agency is proposing "legislation or other major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment." 42 U.S.C.
(2)(C) (emphasis added). This Draft EIS has been prepared by FRA and IDOT consistent with the provisions of Section (2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act of (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. et seq.), the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA (40 CFR part et seq.), and FRA’s Procedures for.
The Environmental Impact Statement is as follows: vague; incomplete; misleading; erroneous; filed with perfunctory and conclusionary language; a non-reviewable environmental record in its present form; and/or in noncompliance with the requirements of 42 U.S.C.
§§ et seq., and the guidelines prepared by the Council on Environmental Quality. (a) A draft EIS must be prepared when the Administration determines that the action is likely to cause significant impacts on the environment. When the applicant, after consultation with any project sponsor that is not the applicant, has notified the Administration in accordance with 23 U.S.C.
(e), and the decision has been made by the Administration to. A, title I, §July 6,Stat. related to accelerated decisionmaking in environmental reviews. Effective Date of Repeal Repeal effective Oct. 1,see section of Pub. –94, set out as an Effective Date of Amendment note under section of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
The National Environmental Policy Act of ("NEPA"), 42 U.S.C. pdf, requires all agencies of the federal government to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for all major projects significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.prepare a detailed environmental impact statement (“EIS”) describing the likely environmental effects, “ad-verse environmental effects which cannot be avoided,” and potential alternatives to the proposal.
42 U.S.C. § (C). On Apthe Forest Service pro-vided scoping comments on FERC’s Notice of Intent to. Cody Ebook. 1. Among other things, Cody was the principal program analyst for and a primary drafter of the OBIA analysis for the SURTASS LFA sonar Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statements and Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statements, for which NMFS was a cooperating agency.
Cody Decl. 2.